A Possible Government Shut Down

The reason there’s still a debate about legislation to fund the current fiscal year of federal spending is because last year’s Congress and the White House failed to pass any of the annual appropriation bills by the deadline of October 1, 2010.  If those in charge last year, with historically large majorities, had met their responsibilities, there would not be the threat of a government shutdown today.  Video here.

Now the issue is whether or not Washington has gotten the message of the last election:  to stop spending more money than we have.  Washington can’t continue to borrow 40 cents of every dollar it spends.  Taxpayers can’t sustain a budget that spends $3.7 trillion a year but collects $2.2 trillion a year.  By overspending, today’s political leaders are leaving a legacy of debt to the next generation, mortgaging their opportunities, and getting in the way of America’s economic recovery and job creation today.

There’s no need to shut down the government.  Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed, with bipartisan support, a bill to fund the government for another week, reduce federal spending another $12 billion, and fund the Defense Department for the remainder of the fiscal year.  It’s a solution that would avoid a shutdown and make sure American service men and women deployed around the world would get their pay.  But the Senate Majority Leader, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, won’t bring up this bill.  What’s more, President Obama sent a message to Congress that he would veto this bill.  If an agreement can’t be reached today to fund the federal government for the remainder of the year, it’s unacceptable that political calculations by the White House and the Senate Majority Leader are getting in the way of passing legislation to pay American troops.  That’s an awful sin for Congress to foist upon military families.