WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) sent a
letter to Secretary of Labor nominee Eugene Scalia seeking assurance that if confirmed, he will enforce whistleblower protections to the fullest extent of the law.
“Whistleblowers are critical to ensuring public safety and preventing waste, fraud and abuse. In the private sector, they alert government authorities to fraud, safety violations, and criminal activity. Congress has enacted dozens of whistleblower laws designed to protect these individuals from retaliation for reporting wrongdoing,”
Grassley wrote.
“As a longtime advocate for whistleblower protections and the Chairman of the Whistleblower Protection Caucus, it is critically important for me to understand your views on this issue. More importantly, the American people both expect and deserve a Secretary of Labor who will fully and faithfully enforce our nation’s whistleblower laws.”
Grassley is a longtime
advocate for whistleblowers. He is co-chairman and co-founder of the Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus. Its purpose is to raise awareness of the need for adequate protections against retaliation for private sector and government employees who call attention to wrongdoing. The caucus works to foster bipartisan discussion on legislative issues affecting the treatment of whistleblowers and serves as a clearinghouse for current information on whistleblower developments of interest in the Senate.
UPDATE:
Sen. Grassley received a response from Secretary of Labor nominee Eugene Scalia to a June 17 letter Grassley sent seeking assurance that if confirmed, Scalia will enforce whistleblower protections to the fullest extent of the law.
“I appreciate Secretary of Labor nominee Eugene Scalia responding to my letter efficiently and fully,” Grassley said. “Whistleblowers play a critical role in good governance and Congress’s efforts to root out waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government. After meeting with Mr. Scalia and hearing directly of his commitment to this important task, I look forward to supporting his nomination.”
Text of the letter is available
HERE and below.
Eugene Scalia
Secretary of Labor Nominee
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20520
Dear Mr. Scalia:
If confirmed as the next Secretary of Labor, you will be responsible for enforcing over twenty of our nation’s most important whistleblower laws.
[1] These laws provide critical protections for individuals who report a wide array of issues to include violations of the law, waste of funds, abuses of authority, and dangers to public health and safety. In light of several anti-whistleblower positions you have taken in the past, it is important for Congress and the American people to understand precisely how you would perform the duties of the Secretary of Labor and to receive assurances that should you be confirmed by the Senate, you will enforce whistleblower protections to the fullest extent of the law.
[2]
Whistleblowers are critical to ensuring public safety and preventing waste, fraud, and abuse. In the private sector, they alert government authorities to fraud, safety violations, and criminal activity. Congress has enacted dozens of whistleblower laws designed to protect these individuals from retaliation for reporting wrongdoing.
[3] For example, whistleblower laws allow airline pilots and nuclear power plant workers who witness safety violations to make protected disclosures to a variety of government agencies.
[4] The Department of Labor (DOL) is tasked with enforcing more whistleblower laws than any other government agency, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Occupational Safety & Health Act, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, Food Safety Modernization Act, Clean Air Act, and the Aviation Investment and Reform Act, among many others.
[5]
I have long said that an attorney’s advocacy on behalf of a client does not necessarily reflect the attorney’s own views. However, in a 2002 brief you filed as Solicitor General for DOL, in a case involving an Assistant United States Attorney who had communications with a Member of Congress regarding environmental contamination at a NASA facility in Ohio, you contradicted then President George W. Bush and erroneously argued that a whistleblower disclosure made to Congress is not protected under the law unless the disclosure is part of a “duly authorized” congressional investigation.
[6] In the same brief, you argued that the Separation of Powers doctrine prohibits whistleblowers from disclosing certain information to Congress, despite the fact that several Supreme Court opinions have strongly reaffirmed Congress’ broad power to conduct oversight of the Executive Branch.
[7]
These prior statements, especially since they appear to have contradicted legal jurisprudence and the Executive Branch’s own stance, need further clarification. As a longtime advocate for whistleblower protections and the Chairman of the Whistleblower Protection Caucus, it is critically important for me to understand your views on this issue. More importantly, the American people both expect and deserve a Secretary of Labor who will fully and faithfully enforce our nation’s whistleblower laws. In order to better understand your stance on these issues, please answer the following questions no later than September 25, 2019:
-
If confirmed as Secretary of Labor, will you commit to faithfully enforce all whistleblower protection laws under DOL’s jurisdiction?
-
Do you believe whistleblowers are only protected if a disclosure to Congress is done in the course of a duly authorized congressional investigation?
-
Absent a declaration of executive privilege, do you believe there is a Separation of Powers issue when an Assistant United State Attorney or any other government employee shares information or documents with a member of Congress? If yes, please explain your reasoning.
-
Will you work with Congress to identify weaknesses in whistleblower protection laws and identify ways to strengthen whistleblower protections?
-
Do you believe whistleblowers provide a benefit to the workforce and society as a whole?
Should you have questions, please contact Dario Camacho of my Committee staff at (202) 224-4515. Thank you for your attention to this important mater.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Grassley
Chairman
Senate Committee on Finance
[2] See Brief for The Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health as Amicus Curiae, Sasse v. United States Dept. of Justice, ARB Case Nos. 02-077 and 02-078 (September 12, 2002) (hereinafter “Brief”).
[4] See 49 U.S.C. § 42121; 42 U.S.C. § 5851.
[5] See supra note 1; See also 29 U.S.C. §660(c); 15 U.S.C. § 2651; 42 U.S.C. § 300j-9(i); 12 U.S.C. § 5567; 42 U.S.C. § 7622; 18 U.S.C. § 1514A; 42 U.S.C. § 42121.
[6] See Brief at 24-26; see also Letter from Senators Charles E. Grassley and Patrick J. Leahy, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, to Alberto R. Gonzales, Counselor to the President (July 31, 2002); Letter from Alberto R. Gonzales, Counselor to the President, to Senators Charles E. Grassley and Patrick J. Leahy, Senate Comm. on the Judiciary (Aug. 1, 2002) (clarifying the administration’s view that the new whistleblower provision neither expands nor contracts congressional investigative authority).
[7] See Brief at 15, 17, 20, 24, 27.
-30-