Prepared Floor Remarks
by U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa
We Must Condemn all
Political Violence Regardless of Ideology
Tuesday, February
2, 2021
We’ve
all been horrified by the senseless criminal acts that occurred at the U.S.
Capitol on January 6, 2021.
A
violent mob was able to overrun Capitol Police and quickly gain access to the
area where a Joint Session of Congress was being held.
Five
people, including a Capitol Police officer, died as a result of this attack.
I
hope that together we can get to the bottom of what occurred on that day and
ensure that it never happens again.
In
the spirit of collaboration, I must direct everyone’s attention to something
that has concerned me, and that is: the need to condemn all political violence
regardless of ideology.
Like
many Americans, I have been deeply troubled by the rioting, looting,
anti-police attacks and deaths which have occurred this summer.
While
many very legitimately protested the death of George Floyd in a peaceful manner
consistent with their rights under the First Amendment, thousands of others did
not.
One
of the most upsetting aspects of the violence this summer has been how it has
targeted innocent law enforcement officers.
Over
700 officers were injured between May 27 and June 8, 2020 alone.
This
number is likely underreported, as nearly 300 of those injuries occur only in
New York City.
Acting
Deputy Homeland Security Secretary Ken Cuccinelli testified at a hearing in
front of Judiciary’s Subcommittee on the Constitution that there had been 277
federal officer injuries at the federal courthouse in Portland, adding further
to that total.
Officers
were assaulted nightly there for months – slashed, hard objects thrown at them,
struck with objects like hammers and baseball bats and blinded with lasers.
In
another offensive, 60 secret service officers were injured during a sustained
attack on the White House, which caused then-President Trump to be brought into
the secure bunker.
The
church across the street from the White House was lit on fire as a part of that
continued assault.
Over
300 people were charged federally for their roles in these weeks and months of
violence.
Eighty
of those charges related to the use of arson and explosives.
Others
involved assaults on officers and destruction of government property.
However,
the nationwide riots, which broke out in nearly every major city in the
country, were predominantly state offenses.
At
least 14,000 people were arrested in 49 cities.
At
least 25 people died in violence related to the riots.
Property
Claim Services, a company that tracks insurance claims relating to riots and
civil disorders, estimated that the insurance losses from the summer’s civil
unrest “far outstrip” all previous records to possibly exceed $2 billion.
It
has been a relatively frequent sight at the summer’s violent events to see
individuals acting in coordination, in all “black bloc,” holding the “A” symbol
of Antifa.
An
admitted Antifa adherent in Portland murdered a conservative protestor.
Antifa
supporters have been charged federally for promoting riots and using Molotov
cocktails.
While
that violence has slackened after President Biden’s electoral victory was
declared, it has far from abated.
Antifa
rioters attacked the Oregon Democratic Party headquarters on Inauguration Day
itself.
The
far left of this country continues to believe violence will get more attention
for their cause, even after a Democratic win in the White House.
Much
of the violence of the summer was specifically investigated by the FBI as
domestic terrorism.
FBI
Director Chris Wray provides statistics on domestic terrorism in his annual
Threats testimony.
He
has previously testified that 900-1,000 domestic terrorism investigations exist
at any given time.
There
are also about 1,000 “homegrown violent extremism” investigations. These are
cases in which an entirely U.S.-based person, without direct contact with a
foreign terrorist organization, is motivated by the global jihadist movement.
And of course, there are thousands more international terrorism investigations.
Former
U.S. Attorney Erin Nealy Cox testified in a subcommittee hearing that over 300
domestic terrorism cases were opened due to the violence this summer.
This
is a significant increase in the ordinary amount of domestic terrorism in the
country.
That
this violence occurred, the facts and the figures that surround it, should not
be news to anyone.
However,
I must admit that I have been extremely surprised by the responses of
Democratic politicians to this violence.
For
weeks and months the most consistent response seemed to be to deny the violence
was occurring at all.
Chairman
Jerrold Nadler of the House Judiciary Committee denied that Antifa itself was
real.
In
a nationally televised debate with then-President Trump, then-candidate Joe
Biden wrongly stated that Antifa is only an “idea.”
This
is after FBI Director Wray had already testified to Congress that Antifa was
absolutely “a real thing” and that the FBI had cases and investigations against
those calling themselves “Antifa.”
It
seems that some Democrats are living in a very different world than those who
have seen businesses boarded up, if not burned out, images of violence in the
streets and terrifying attacks on police officers.
When
the violence was acknowledged, it seems to have been condoned, rather than
condemned.
Now
Vice President Kamala Harris previously said “They’re not going to stop, and
everyone, beware. […] And they should not, and we should not.”
She
did not disclaim the rioting and unrest and direct her followers only to lawful
action.
Congresswoman
Ayanna Pressley stated, “there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as
there is unrest in our lives.”
Speaker
of the House Nancy Pelosi famously equivocated on the widespread property
damage that “people will do what they do.”
That
indifference to the violence that our constituents were enduring was
dramatically shattered when a violent riot came to the Capitol itself.
After
that event, many members of Congress asked why a more militarized force had not
protected them from a group of then-President Trump’s supporters who turned
violent.
Police
officers were again considered heroes and protectors, unlike last summer.
The
presence of National Guard members was welcome rather than decried unlike last
summer in Portland and Seattle.
Many
of the people of this country would like to have such resources available to
them to ensure their safety.
Since
the day of the attack on the Capitol, I have heard much of a renewed focus
among my Democratic colleagues on combatting domestic terrorism and political
violence.
This
is very welcome, and I hope we will be able to work together to keep Americans
safe.
However,
any work that we do in this area must be focused on preventing violence, no
matter what ideology is given to justify it.
In
fact, a recent DHS bulletin noted the breadth of potential threats we may be
facing after the Capitol riot, including domestic violent extremists “motivated
by a range of issues, including anger over COVID-19 restrictions, the 2020
election results and police use of force” as well as “racial and ethnic
tension,” and homegrown violent extremists “inspired by foreign terrorist
groups.”
The
response that I’ve seen to the Capitol riot here in Congress has not given me
hope that we are in agreement about combatting this broad range of threats.
I’ve
seen that many Democratic members of Congress seem to be discussing the need to
combat “white supremacism” with reference to the Capital riot.
We
must absolutely combat white supremacism wherever it occurs but we have a
responsibility to understand the true factors that led to the attack on this
building.
I
hope to learn more from law enforcement over the coming weeks and months about
what the involvement of white supremacists, or any other extremists, was in
this attack.
However,
I’m concerned the use of the term may have a different purpose: to try to
portray any supporters of former President Trump, who garnered over 74 million
votes in the most recent election, as white supremacists.
Congresswoman
Cori Bush stated on the House floor that former President Trump was a “white
supremacist president who incited a white supremacist insurrection.”
I
hope everyone can agree that such rhetorical and inaccurate characterizations
are dangerous.
More
concerning seems to be the idea that violence committed by the far left, or for
left-leaning ideologies, is in some way tolerable because of the left’s
assessment that the purpose is noble.
However,
right-leaning thought, whether accompanied by violence or not, is considered
terroristic.
Former
CIA Director John Brennan, whose credibility has been questioned, praised
incoming President Biden’s inaugural reference to defeating “white supremacy,”
and likened libertarians to “religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists,
bigots, racists, nativists.”
It’s
hard to see how libertarianism, a mainstream conservative political ideology
which is scarcely in any way associated with violence, is related to the other
terms in Mr. Brennan’s list.
Unless
of course, he’s simply referring to religious Americans as “religious
extremists,” those who believe in rule of law rather than Antifa rioting as
“authoritarians” and “fascists,” and those who believe in having a functioning
immigration system as “bigots,” “racists,” and “nativists.”
In
short, these are all terms that are applied regularly, and unfairly, to
conservative Americans using peaceable means to argue for their ideas: religious
freedom, law and order and secure borders.
Congresswoman
Jackie Speier was even more direct in a tweet, suggesting that all Republicans
be labeled terrorists.
As
a body, we may begin looking into domestic terrorism more generally.
I
look forward to doing so.
I’m
sure all members will share my commitment that the focus of our inquiries
should be on all of the politically motivated violence we’ve seen in this
country, not a subset.
The
men and women of this nation who have been affected by Antifa and other
left-wing extremists are entitled to much more than a cursory acknowledgement
of that fact.
Likewise,
I hope no part of our efforts will focus on demonizing the peaceful expression
of ideas with which Democratic members disagree.
I
will be sharing these concerns directly with the incoming Senate Judiciary
chairman in a letter and I look forward to working with Senator Durbin on a
path forward.