State Department Office of the Inspector General failed to issue report on investigation into the October 2016 meeting between Steele, state department officials in run-up to the Carter Page FISA application
WASHINGTON – U.S. Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, sent a letter to U.S. Department of State Inspector General Steve Linick today seeking an explanation as to why his office did not issue a report on its investigation into the October 2016 meeting between Christopher Steele and Orbis Intelligence employee Tatyana Duran, then-Deputy Assistant Secretary Kathleen Kavalec, and then-Special Envoy Jonathan Winer. The senators also seek to understand why the state department OIG did not interview all parties present at that October 2016 meeting.
“We write seeking to understand why the OIG did not issue a report on its investigation and did not interview employees who most likely have relevant information regarding the subject matter of the inquiry,” the senators wrote.
The senators asked the state department OIG about its failure to interview Mr. Winer in light of him introducing Mr. Steele to high-ranking state department officials with direct access to their counterparts at the FBI days before the FBI sought a FISA order to surveil a Trump campaign official.
The senators also learned the state department OIG discovered at least one department official, Mr. Winer, utilized non-official email accounts to conduct official department business, and they have requested an explanation as to why the OIG did not interview Mr. Winer about his use of personal email when he directed others to upload those emails to classified systems within the department. In addition, the senators learned that the state department OIG determined a department employee may have engaged in anti-Trump political conduct, in violation of the Hatch Act, and the OIG referred that individual to the Office of Special Counsel for Investigation. That Hatch Act investigation is ongoing.
The Office of Special Counsel is the permanent, independent investigative agency for personnel matters in the federal government and is not related to Robert Mueller’s temporary prosecutorial office within the justice department.
Full text of the letter is below, and the letter can be viewed
Sens. Johnson and Grassley’s May 9, 2019, letters to the state department and the FBI can be viewed
September 12, 2019
The Honorable Steve A. Linick
U.S. Department of State
2121 Virginia Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20037
Dear Inspector General Linick:
On May 9, 2019, we wrote to the Department of State (Department) seeking information about the October 11, 2016, meeting between Christopher Steele, Orbis Intelligence employee Tatyana Duran, then-Deputy Assistant Secretary Kathleen Kavalec, and then-Special Envoy Jonathan Winer, who arranged the meeting. Since that letter, we have learned that the Department provided your office information and documents related to that meeting. Our staff contacted your office to understand what actions, if any, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) took after receiving the information and documents.
Your office briefed our staff and, although unfortunately short on details, we learned that the OIG reviewed: (1) whether any Department employees engaged in activity in violation of the Hatch Act; (2) whether Jonathan Winer complied with Department policy and regulation on intelligence gathering; and (3) whether Jonathan Winer violated classification protocol. The briefing also disclosed that the OIG determined that a State Department employee may have engaged in anti-Trump political conduct in violation of the Hatch Act and referred that individual to the Office of Special Counsel for investigation. Despite this recommendation, however, the OIG did not publish a written report about its review. Moreover, we also learned that the OIG never interviewed Ms. Kavalec or Mr. Winer, the Department employees that were present for the meeting with Mr. Steele. Nor did the OIG interview Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland, who originally received Mr. Steele’s request for a meeting and whom Ms. Kavalec believed to have further information about Mr. Steele.
Additionally, documents produced to the Committee and OIG confirm that at least one Department official, Mr. Winer, utilized non-official email accounts to conduct official Department business. Internal e-mails show Mr. Winer utilized at least two different non-official email accounts as early as December 2014, the same year that he apparently began to communicate with Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS. Committee staff is aware of roughly 27 e mails sent by Mr. Winer to the Department from non-official email accounts. Many of these emails include a note from Mr. Winer requesting the email contents be placed on the “high side” and sent to “three individuals” within the Department.
We write seeking to understand why the OIG did not issue a report on its investigation and did not interview employees who most likely have relevant information regarding the subject matter of the inquiry. Further, with the Department’s recent history of officials using non-official e-mail to conduct official business, why did the OIG not seek to interview Mr. Winer regarding his use of non-official email accounts for government business? In addition, why did the OIG not interview Mr. Winer to learn why he introduced Mr. Steele to other high-ranking State Department employee’s days before the FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order to surveil a Trump campaign official?
Please provide a response to this letter no later than September 26, 2019.
Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Downey of Chairman Johnson’s staff at (202) 224-4751, or Joshua Flynn-Brown of Chairman Grassley’s staff at (202) 224-4515.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Charles E. Grassley
Committee on Finance