Grassley News
Grassley: Drug Trafficking in West Africa Fuels Instability... Read More >>
Grassley Seeks Information on SEC Inspector General Office Turmoil... Read More >>
Common Sense Amendment Wins Approval in Judiciary Committee
Most of us use a computer without even thinking of the consequences. When we sit down at home or at work, we check our email, read the news and generally go about our routine.
What we don’t know is that we may be in violation of federal criminal law based upon a violation of internet terms of service agreements or employment agreements for misusing computers. For example, under a reading of current law argued in federal court by the Department of Justice, something as simple as checking your personal email account at work may be against the law. By extension, this reading could also make it a federal felony for a father to use his son’s Facebook password to log into the son’s Facebook account and check messages and photos; for a 17 year-old to claim she is 18 in order to sell goods in certain online marketplaces; or even for using instant messenger on a computer at work.
While a majority of the time this is no big deal, there have been two recent criminal prosecutions brought by the Justice Department in California that have argued breaching terms of service on websites is a violation of federal law.
Legal commentators have criticized these prosecutions as an overreach of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. They point out that this expansion of the law could lead to criminalizing any misuse of an internet website terms of service agreement.
So, yesterday, in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s debate on a new bill, the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act, I offered an amendment to clarify that the definition of “exceeds authorized access” in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act does not include violations of internet terms of service agreements or non-government employment agreements restricting computer access.
The bipartisan amendment was passed by the committee on a voice vote. It’s a common sense solution that helps clean up some of the expansive provisions of our criminal code and ensures that innocent computer users are not federal criminals.
September 16, 2011
Most of us use a computer without even thinking of the consequences. When we sit down at home or at work, we check our email, read the news and generally go about our routine.
What we don’t know is that we may be in violation of federal criminal law based upon a violation of internet terms of service agreements or employment agreements for misusing computers. For example, under a reading of current law argued in federal court by the Department of Justice, something as simple as checking your personal email account at work may be against the law. By extension, this reading could also make it a federal felony for a father to use his son’s Facebook password to log into the son’s Facebook account and check messages and photos; for a 17 year-old to claim she is 18 in order to sell goods in certain online marketplaces; or even for using instant messenger on a computer at work.
While a majority of the time this is no big deal, there have been two recent criminal prosecutions brought by the Justice Department in California that have argued breaching terms of service on websites is a violation of federal law.
Legal commentators have criticized these prosecutions as an overreach of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. They point out that this expansion of the law could lead to criminalizing any misuse of an internet website terms of service agreement.
So, yesterday, in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s debate on a new bill, the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act, I offered an amendment to clarify that the definition of “exceeds authorized access” in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act does not include violations of internet terms of service agreements or non-government employment agreements restricting computer access.
The bipartisan amendment was passed by the committee on a voice vote. It’s a common sense solution that helps clean up some of the expansive provisions of our criminal code and ensures that innocent computer users are not federal criminals.
September 16, 2011