Chuck Grassley

United States Senator from Iowa

Instagram

Flickr

Twitter

Facebook

Grassley, Colleagues Call for Oversight of Independent Agencies’ Unchecked Regulations

Mar 05, 2020
WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today joined an effort led by Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.), member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, to change the authority of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to conduct a thorough and rigorous review of independent agencies’ regulations. Currently, independent agencies are not required to undergo a review by OIRA.
 
In the letter to President Trump, the Senators wrote, “We believe that OIRA should review the significant regulatory actions of independent regulatory agencies to increase the transparency and accountability of the regulatory process. Although these agencies have been created with certain protections designed to insulate them from the political process, they are not a fourth branch of government that is exempt from Congressional and Executive oversight.”
 
Grassley, Lankford and Johnson were joined in sending the letter by Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Jim Risch (R-Idaho), Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.), David Perdue (R-Ga.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), John Thune (R-S.D.) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) .
 
The full text of the letter can be found below and here
 
Dear Mr. President:
 
We write to thank you for your leadership in reducing the regulatory burden faced by U.S. businesses. Many businesses have shared that the regulatory pause has provided the certainty to invest and hire additional employees. However, we are concerned that a growing number of regulations are being promulgated by independent agencies, which are not required to undergo a thorough and rigorous review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). Accordingly, we believe that OIRA should review the significant regulatory actions of independent regulatory agencies to increase the transparency and accountability of the regulatory process. Although these agencies have been created with certain protections designed to insulate them from the political process, they are not a fourth branch of government that is exempt from Congressional and Executive oversight.
 
Since its creation in 1980, OIRA has served as the check on the administrative rulemaking process. Primarily through the requirements set forth in Executive Order 12866, OIRA ensures agencies rigorously assess the costs and benefits of their significant regulatory actions. This analysis provides the public with an estimate of a regulation’s economic impact as well as potential burdens the rule may impose on the public. Regulations that bind the public, regardless of the issuing agency, must be subject to thorough review by OIRA.
 
When OIRA was created, the Reagan Administration exempted independent agencies from centralized review, not because of questions over the Executive branch’s authority to do so, but for the practical reason that these agencies were not a priority for the new office. For the most of their existence, independent agencies occupied a relatively small role in the administrative process. Today, however, these agencies play a major role in regulating all aspects of the economy, including broadband internet access, banking and securities exchange, as well as energy and environmental policies. This increased role in rulemaking requires greater oversight from both Congress and the Executive branch.
 
Centralized review of independent agencies has a long history of support from former OIRA Administrators of both parties, the Administrative Conference of the United States, and the American Bar Association. This is not a foreign concept as OIRA already conducts limited review of all rules, including those issued by independent agencies, to determine whether the rule is “major” under the Congressional Review Act.
 
Studies by the Administrative Conference of the United States and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have found the analysis conducted by independent agencies without OIRA oversight is not as searching and thorough as agencies clearly within the Executive branch. These agencies often fail to produce quantitative cost-benefit analysis if not explicitly directed to by statute. GAO confirmed this, writing “[w]hile most financial regulators said that they attempt to follow OMB’s guidance in principle or spirit, we found that they did not consistently follow key elements of the guidance in their regulatory analyses.”
 
Extending OIRA review to these agencies would increase transparency and consistency in the administrative process as well as improve the quality of the analysis used to develop regulations that bind the American people.
 
All regulation, regardless of the issuing agency, should be firmly grounded in a statute passed by Congress. The Executive is responsible for ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed, and this should include a rigorous and thorough review of all significant regulatory action. Independent agencies are not independent from accountability, and therefore we urge you to use your existing authority to extend OIRA review to independent agencies.
 
-30-