Statement for the Senate
Record by Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa
Nomination of Eric
Garcetti to be Ambassador to India
Mayor Garcetti is
Unfit for Office
March 14, 2023
Last
Congress, I spoke of my strong opposition to the nomination of Eric Garcetti to
be Ambassador to the Republic of India. I opposed the nomination due to the
serious and credible allegations that he enabled sexual harassment and racism
to run rampant in the Los Angeles mayor’s office. When the nomination expired,
I had hoped President Biden would recognize his egregious mistake, believe the
victims, and change course.
President
Biden failed to do so.
Indefensibly,
at the same time the Biden administration decries sexual harassment and racism,
it’s now twice nominated an individual to represent our country abroad who has enabled
those very same disgusting acts. Accordingly, I continue to oppose Garcetti’s
nomination and ask this question: what will it take for the Biden
administration to believe the victims? That same question should be posed to
every member in the Senate that’s considering voting for him.
This
Congress, I’ve sent several bipartisan letters to the Department of Justice
seeking information regarding sexual misconduct by Bureau of Prisons personnel
and inmates against staff. With Senators Durbin and Padilla, I met with the
Bureau of Prisons Director to further investigate sexual misconduct and discuss
reforms to enhance prevention, reporting, investigation, prosecution, and
discipline of these matters.
With
respect to Mayor Garcetti, I’ve made clear to my colleagues and the American
people that credible whistleblowers approached my office about concerning
allegations that he was aware of and enabled his deputy chief of staff, Rick
Jacobs, to sexually harass several employees within the mayor’s office. These
men and women alleged that Rick Jacobs engaged in inappropriate and degrading physical
contact without their consent. They alleged that Rick Jacobs made crude sexual
remarks and gestures towards staff and others. They alleged that he made
blatantly racist remarks towards Asians and other minorities.
These
allegations have also been publicly reported by many news outlets. Text
messages made public by the Los Angeles Times indicate that these incidents
were common knowledge among Garcetti’s staff. A now infamous picture shows
Jacobs inappropriately touching an individual next to him. In the picture,
Mayor Garcetti is standing on the other side of Jacobs.
Mayor
Garcetti said under oath during his nomination that “I want to say
unequivocally that I never witnessed, nor was it brought to my attention, the
behavior that’s been alleged, and I also want to assure you if it had been, I
would have immediately taken action to stop that.”
How
can that statement be true when there’s a photo with Jacobs inappropriately
touching an individual next to Garcetti? How can that statement be true when
text messages exist from his own staff discussing the toxic work environment
within the mayor’s office?
In
total, my office identified over 19 individuals who’ve either witnessed Jacobs’
behavior or were the victims of it. So, who are these brave and courageous individuals
who made these allegations? Are they Republican operatives? No. They’re his
former Communications Director, senior staffers, junior staffers, businessmen,
civic leaders, and a Los Angeles Police Department officer assigned to protect
him.
This
isn’t a political hit job. This is a bipartisan endeavor to stop an inadequate
nominee.
To
defend himself, Mayor Garcetti has pointed to a report, which inconceivably
purports to clear Jacobs of any wrongdoing. The report was conducted by a law
firm hired and paid for by the city of Los Angeles. Mayor Garcetti and the city
of Los Angeles would be liable if the report concluded sexual harassment
occurred. The report was also delivered to the city of Los Angeles under
Attorney Client privilege, apparently in the hope that no one outside the city
would ever see it.
The
report failed to interview multiple firsthand witnesses. The interviews weren’t
taken under penalty of perjury. The report focused exclusively on allegations
of sexual harassment made by the Los Angeles Police Department officer and
failed to give due weight to other witnesses. For example, the report includes
an interview with Jacobs in which he admits to using racist language, kissing,
hugging, and squeezing people’s shoulders. The report also identifies the
individual in the lewd photo I mentioned earlier. The report says that the
individual stated that Jacob’s actions weren’t funny and embarrassed that
person.
That makes it clear nonconsensual physical contact
occurred. It’s evidence that sexual harassment occurred. And it literally
occurred right next to Mayor Garcetti.
The
last time I spoke about this matter was right after President Biden signed the
Speak Out Act into law. I co-sponsored that bill which Senator Gillibrand led. The
law enables survivors to speak out about workplace sexual assault and
harassment.
So,
on the one hand, the Biden administration says it supports victims. Yet, on the
other hand, the Biden administration supports a nominee who enables misconduct
that creates more victims.
The
Biden administration’s positions are irreconcilable. They’re the very
definition of tone deafness. The Biden Administration and all those who support
this nomination have sent a message that victims will only be believed when
politically convenient. The Biden administration has no credibility when it
comes to protecting victims of sexual harassment.
To
my Senate colleagues, do you support victims of sexual harassment and racism or
a man who enabled it for years, leaving many victims in his wake? You can’t support both.
Mayor
Garcetti’s own staff have spoken out to stop this nomination at a risk to their
careers. One of them is Naomi Seligman, who was Mayor Garcetti’s former
communications director and one of the many whistleblowers who worked with my
office regarding this nomination. She said that Garcetti’s vote out of the
Foreign Relations Committee “on International Women’s Day no less, shows a real
disconnect between the rhetoric we hear from elected leaders who claim to
support victims of workplace sexual harassment and the pass they give to party
loyalists in the next breath. It’s disheartening to say the least.”
I
agree. Mayor Garcetti is incompatible with the office that he seeks.
I, again,
strongly encourage my colleagues—Democrats and Republicans alike—to review the
evidence found in my investigative report, as well as in the press. Most
importantly, listen to the victims. The facts and the evidence compel me to
vote no, and my colleagues must join me in doing the same.
RELATED:
-30-